author

Blog

The blog contains some of my thoughts on things like writing, science and how that all works together to affect society.

Death and the Lost Cause

“Now I am become death the destroyer of worlds”.

In one of the most well known examples of the interaction between technology and society, J. Robert Oppenheimer said he thought of this phrase from the Bhagavad Gita while observing the Trinity nuclear bomb test on July 16, 1945. Oppenheimer was a deep thinker, contributing much more to physics than just his work on the Manhattan Project. As with all deep thinking, there are threads and connections to the larger world, and the way we interact with technology. Oppenheimer captured the big picture in just nine words, which he could do because of his deep understanding.

Deep thinkers such as Oppenheimer aside, general understanding of the human relationship with technology is lacking. There is no greater example of this than the way changes in technology supported the racial divide in the US since the end of the Civil War. Racism has no place in an advanced society based on science. Superficial differences that might trigger a response in the primitive parts of our brains have no meaning when analyzed objectively. Yet extensive racism persists in the country that was advanced enough to develop both nuclear devices and the transistor, and many other advances in technology. Understanding the role technology played in propagating racism is necessary to ending it, which means looking at the history of technology in the US and how technology was deliberately used to spread racist ideas.

Nuclear power and weapons came out of the explosion of technology that began around 1850. Precursors to that technology explosion, such as steam power, improved iron-working, scientific advances, and the Age of Enlightenment go back about 300 years. Individual advances such as Newton's Principia or the writings that brought Galileo before the Inquisition are understood today for the important scientific developments they were, but at the time, they did little to affect the daily lives of most people. Just as a bubble of magma melts through the Earth's crust for many years before erupting as a volcano, it took time for scientific advances from the Renaissance through the Age of Enlightenment to propagate through the crust of human understanding. When these ideas did erupt into the general consciousness, they changed the landscape.

We are still adjusting to the societal impacts wrought by the technological changes of the nineteenth century. For one thing, those changes did not affect all areas of the globe uniformly, and still have not brought full benefit of technology to most of the world's population. The ability to fabricate iron pipe in large quantity at a low price led to clean drinking water in parts of the world but not everywhere. The technology is available; it just hasn't been used as well as it should be. Death still destroys worlds in places where poor choices don't use technology to help people.

We in the United States have yet to adapt to the technology shift in the treatment of fellow humans, especially people of color. On October 2, 1836, a sailing ship docked in in the port of Falmouth in Cornwall. It was nearing the end of the Age of Sail, though to the people on that ship, returning home from a journey around the world, wooden sailing ships were in their glory, the peak of technology. A young man disembarked the ship and dashed to his family home to start publishing what he had seen, learned, and understood on that journey, including thoughts that began to come to him when that ship stopped in the Galapagos. It has been over one hundred and fifty years since Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, a book that proved, among other things, that all homo sapiens are more alike than we are different. Further research by a multitude of others would reveal that all humans are from Africa, our ancestors just left the continent at different times if at all. No humans are objectively better than any other human is, but there are still some who seek artificial differentiation based on superficialities.

By the 1850's a deep rift had grown in the United States. Steam and iron created industry in the northern and western states, while slavery powered the largely agricultural southern states. Much of the world had abolished slavery, or was on the way to abolishing it. Southern US states resisted this global trend, becoming ever fiercer in their demands for northern states to return escaped slaves and recognize slaveholder’s right to own other humans. On December 20, 1860, South Carolina issued an ordinance of secession based loosely on the US Declaration of Independence, though omitting phrases such as "...all men are created equal...", and stating that the reason for secession was the failure of northern states to support slavery. Other states followed South Carolina and the crisis grew through early 1861 until on April 12 the South Carolina Militia began firing artillery on the United States Fort Sumter.

Between that April day in 1861 and exactly four years later, when the Army of Northern Virginia marched past the Union Army of the Potomac and stacked their rifles in surrender, the technology of war changed completely. On land the Minie' ball obsoleted infantry tactics that descended from medieval armies, and General Ulysses Grant developed new battle techniques that predicted the battlefields of World War I by 50 years. Balloons were used for surveillance, and photography recorded real battle conditions in a way that paintings never had. At sea, a submarine sank a warship in combat for the first time, and the ironclads at the Battle of Hampton Roads rendered all the wood-hulled navies of the world obsolete in a matter of hours. Death was working overtime to keep up with all the fatalities new technologies were creating.

Technological changes in warfare never changed more rapidly than the next eighty years. A wooden ship sunk by an ironclad at Hampton Roads was sunk by ramming, an ancient technique with an engagement distance between ships of zero. Over the next decades, the engagement distance between ships grew exponentially, thousands of meters in the engagement between the Huascar and Cochrane, tens of thousands of meters in the Battle of Jutland, and hundreds of thousands of meters on December 7, 1941 when the Japanese fleet attacked from a distance of four hundred and forty kilometers. That war would end with the nuclear explosions on August 6th and 9th, 1945, when the bombs Oppenheimer helped create literally destroyed the worlds of hundreds of thousands human beings. It took only hours for ironclads to render wooden warships obsolete, and it took only days between July 16th and August 6th to go from a test in the New Mexico desert to use of a nuclear weapon in war. Technologies often change the world in rapid and powerful ways.

Technology created many powerful beneficial changes over those same eighty years, including indoor plumbing, electricity, automobiles, and wood-based paper. The ancient world, with it's ancient ideas of human populations separated by skin color, was destroyed by an overwhelming march of science and technology. European advantages of geography were displaced as peoples around the globe quickly adopted and adapted the new technologies. These generally beneficial technologies often had unintended consequences. Automobiles solved the health problems of using horses in cities, and electricity made life safer and more convenient, but both contributed to new problems such as climate change. Wood pulp paper would have it's own benefits and problems.

In the former Confederate states, a powerful and deadly use of emerging technology was unleashed as the war ended. Slavery was the foundation of the Confederacy, as described in the documents of secession and the Confederate Constitution, yet even as the last slaves were freed on June 19th and the last armed insurgents surrendered a few days later, a new narrative about the war started to form. This narrative was not based in the documented facts of the war, but illusions of an antebellum glory that never existed. There were many aspects to the Lost Cause narrative that slaves were happy to work on plantations, or that slaves were not capable of being free, that slaveholders treated slaves well, that the war was due to Union aggression, and slavery was not the cause of the war. All of these were, and are, lies. These lies, and others developed as part of the Lost Cause narratives, might have faded into history had they come at another time. As it happened, the Lost Cause lies started to proliferate near the beginning of the technological explosion, and just as Oppenheimer realized too late that he had become Death, the nineteenth century technological explosion carried the Lost Cause lies far and wide without people understanding the immense destruction they would wreak.

Printing was largely a manual process for hundreds of years after Gutenberg invented movable type. By the end of the Civil War steam and steel were becoming easy and inexpensive to use, and the new ability to make volumes of good quality paper from wood pulp was making paper inexpensive as well. Combining the availability of inexpensive paper with larger and more powerful presses, large scale publishing became a reality, and with scale came standardization. Texts could now be produced in large numbers, and for the first time large quantities of books were accessible to many people. Newspapers began to proliferate, using larger and more automated presses. The first examples of true mass media began to proliferate, and those promoting the Lost Cause lies were quick to adopt this technology. Organizations such as the Southern Historical Society collected and published Lost Cause narratives from insurgent leaders anxious to justify their loss and distance themselves from the failures of the Confederacy. Those of us who have the benefit of history understand the dangers of false narratives, but during the middle of the late nineteenth century the general public had not yet developed such understanding and the lies were left unchallenged.

Before long, the Lost Cause lies were deliberately incorporated into school textbooks. Textbooks themselves were a new technology made possible by the advances in printing, and groups such as the United Daughters of the Confederacy saw to it that history textbooks in the South told only the Lost Cause narratives. Even today, many elementary and secondary school texts repeat the lies of the Lost Cause even in the face of objective facts. Other actions by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, such as building monuments and naming roads, were older propaganda techniques that did not spread widely beyond the Confederate states. Unlike these older forms of propaganda, the new technology of mass media spread the Lost Cause lies throughout the United States.

Reconstruction was an opportunity to move the United States into a leadership position in the world. Had the attempts to unify the nation and all citizens within it been successful, the technological advances of the war and the later innovations born of the diversity of the population could have made the United States a global leader earlier than eventually happened. If white supremacy had been put down, the US would have been in a uniquely powerful position to share domestically developed technologies with all peoples of the world. Instead, the Lost Cause lies poisoned the soul of America, dividing citizens by superficial skin color into separate living and working environments, different churches, and different economies, through Jim Crow laws, police violence, and lynchings. Media technology was key to this oppression, destroying worlds of opportunity for millions of American citizens.

Around 1900 former Confederate soldiers started to pass away due to age, leading to a resurgence of the Lost Cause narratives. More statues and memorials were built, with the intent of intimidating black people and asserting white power. More books were published, including one book by a deeply racist author, titled The Clansman. This author, who does not deserve to be named here, used the technology of publishing to disseminate wildly racist ideas that had already been proven wrong by On the Origin of Species and subsequent work. This author was not alone in publishing racist ideas, not by a long shot, but this particular book would go on to inspire of some of the most vile events of US history.

In 1915 a film was released, a technological milestone in the development of visual media. This film used new and innovative camera techniques, and, at about three hours, was the longest film yet made. This film also pioneered the use of extras, making hundreds of extras appear to be thousands. Orchestras were used for the first time to accompany the film, innovating the use of sound with film. Unfortunately, this film also marks the use of technology to deliver a disgusting message of propaganda, something repeated by other films in the US and around the world. This film, The Birth of a Nation, was based on the book The Clansman, and portrayed black men as violent and ignorant, whites as victims, and the KKK as heroes. Lost Cause lies had crossed from the first mass media technology of print to the new technology of film.

After the release of the film, membership in the KKK dramatically increased. This increase in KKK membership and other events set the stage for events starting May 31, 1921 in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Reports in the print media of a young black man attacking a young white woman brought out crowds, and an editorial in the paper appears to have inspired violence, though no copy of that editorial can now be found. On June 1, white mobs made real the fictional story of The Birth of a Nation as they viciously attacked the most successful black neighborhood in the country. Technology, first print and then film, had become Death, and in Tulsa and many other places destroyed the worlds of black people across the US.

Technologies of redlining and highway planning were used to maintain separation of white and black neighborhoods for many decades. When automobiles became common the demand for high speed arteries into the hearts of cities grew. These highways displaced many black and minority communities, slashing through their residences and isolating them from city centers, while providing a path for whites to flee to the suburbs. As with the deconstruction of Reconstruction, this deliberate segregation harmed all Americans, turning vibrancy into decay. Had the highways been planned using thoughtful techniques that created opportunities for everyone it would have avoided decades of urban problems. There is no question that the highway designs and the redlining of certain areas by institutions to deliberately segregate populations had a direct and harmful effect on people of color.

Atrocities in other countries since the end of the Civil War, such as South African apartheid and Nazi death camps, came after a general awareness of mass media technology. Compared to the documentation of the horrors of slavery, other atrocities are better documented. Those who would deny more recent atrocities are faced with overwhelming evidence of the truth, often from a variety of sources. In contrast, the mass media narrative of the Lost Cause looms large next to the documentation of slavery. Lost Cause advocates dismiss evidence of slavery as outliers, claiming that the majority of cases were different. Though the Lost Cause narrative is just the same handful of lies told over and over, in aggregate it creates a big lie that seems to carry weight until examined closely. Using mass media created an artificial abundance of documentation at the dawn of mass media, before the general population became aware of and sensitive to the power that media can have. That allowed the Lost Cause lies to take hold and maintain the narrative in a way that later big lies could not. In South Africa and Germany we see that media has been used to create context instead of suppressing fact. Honest assessment of the records is taught, and monuments mark the atrocities that occurred. White supremacy was no less potent in South Africa than Alabama, and there is no denying the extreme racism in the ashes at Auschwitz, but in the United States the Lost Cause lies still remain.

There are persistent dangers in failing to understand how technology allowed the Lost Cause lies to propagate. Since these lies have persisted for one hundred fifty years with little direct analysis or challenge, it demonstrated the power of the big lie. Current evolution and climate change deniers may not have directly taken their causes from the Lost Cause narrative, but the fact that it has been allowed to persist showed that there was space in the media to create artificial truth. Understanding how the early days of mass media allowed the Lost Cause lies to spread is critical to unwinding them and ending the damage they still do. Mass media can undo the lies of mass media. Some new analysis of the Lost Cause is developing, and some of the monuments of hatred are starting to come down, but much more needs to be done. Textbooks must be revised, using the best historical research, to tell the actual conditions of antebellum slavery and the events of the Civil War. Monuments and museums documenting the realities of slavery and the effects of the Lost Cause narrative must be expanded where they exist and established where they do not. At the same time, there were some notable technical advances made by the Confederacy, and we must include them without endorsing the society that created them.

Undoing the damage of the Lost Cause will take time, but is necessary to the future prosperity of the United States. The US might not have made it to the moon first were it not for a brilliant black woman who was a mathematician at NASA. She had the opportunity to contribute, but we will never know how many brilliant scientists, inventors, and artists never had the opportunity to develop their ideas because the Lost Cause lies unjustly painted them as ignorant or stole their futures. Looking at current challenges such as global climate change, we must face all anti-scientific rhetoric with strong resolve. If we allow artificial truth to persist, it will propagate, as the Lost Cause lies have demonstrated for over one hundred and fifty years. Our future depends on collaboration to address global challenges, and we cannot risk losing even one great mind to long disproved lies such as the Lost Cause.

Additionally, as we look forward at new forms of media interacting with our lives and society, the Internet, cell phones, digital audio and video technologies, and wearable tech, we must learn from the history of the Lost Cause lies. Narrative has great power through emotional resonance. If we do not regulate the narrative stream, it will drown us in lies, half-truths, and deliberate confusion. Everyone loses if that happens. Lost Cause lies poisoned the United States, but we can fight through that poison, heal the wounds, and learn to use technology better in the future. When we do, we will become creators of new worlds instead of destroyers.

 

Kris Butler
COVID-19 Response

As I write this the United States is in the middle of a national quarantine for the COVID-19, and so far my own experience with the disease is extraordinarily average. Along with most people sheltering in place, I have not shown any symptoms but also have not been tested for either the virus or antibodies. The tools exist to manage this disease but on a national scale, they have not been used well. This failure to better prepare is a human failure, not a failure of our science and technology. As one example, labs have equipment to do testing but are lacking the supplies to process the tests, or in some cases even collect samples. There was an absence of planning, preparation, and response in the early days of the pandemic. How is it that we can build technology but not be prepared to use it?

Our relationship with technology is very complex. Though we create technology we also fear it, as reflected in so much of our past and present science fantasy. Stories abound of technology run amok, whether in the form of an AI takeover or nuclear disaster or zombie apocalypse or other spectacular catastrophe. At the same time, technology delivers these stories faster and more powerfully than ever before, streaming CGI created video at megabit or even gigabit speeds across the Internet. We love these stories and consume them voraciously, using technology to process our fears and fantasies about technology. From the perspective of our human love-fear relationship with technology, it's possible to understand how we could fail to have the supplies needed to operate our high tech testing machines, It is not the whole story, though.

We are still adapting our cultures to the changes in technology that started in the middle of the 19th century. Old ideas of leadership persist, allowing a pandemic to take hold. Human cities have never before had the size populations that they have today, populations only made possible by the technologies of water purification and sewage treatment, along with medicine, materials science, transportation and energy. Leadership, though, often trails the technology. The great danger to our health and economy that a pandemic represents is easy to ignore by leaders that are more interested in short term glory and prestige than the productive stability of society.

Technologies reduced common disease and allowed for the explosive population growth of the twentieth century. As an unintended consequence, the risk of a novel disease causing widespread damage grew. We saw this happen in the 1918 pandemic, where new and rapid transportation spread the disease widely and quickly. Leadership at the time often suppressed the information needed to fight the pandemic with resulting high death tolls. Even with this knowledge, many current leaders around the world have tried to suppress information about COVID-19, until the data showed the truth of the danger. Even in the face of the data, some leaders still deny the facts.

That's not to say that all leaders have failed as badly as those that deny or underplay the dangers. Local leaders in places such as San Francisco and New York have used science to manage the outbreak as well as they can without national organization, flattening the curve in their jurisdictions. What can we learn from the different approaches to leadership?

Collaboration between health officials was key to the response in the Bay Area. This type of collaboration is common in many technical fields, where standards are vital for daily operations. Once familiar with working collaboratively in routine matters, working together in an emergency becomes easier. However, political leaders used to negotiating for power are not well suited to the sort of collaborative work needed to overcome a threat such as a pandemic. Wise political leaders listen to the technical teams, while poor leaders ignore or even contradict them. As our society continues to develop technologically and populations continues to urbanize we will have no choice but to develop more collaborative forms of leadership. Old political ideas are not well suited to meeting the threats of an advanced society, which we are already seeing in the high fatality rates in the United States. In contrast to the old political ideas, collaborative organizations at all levels have generally been ahead of the pandemic, issuing warnings while there was still time to take action. If we are to avoid future pandemics, the voice of collaborative organizations must be elevated.

Collaborative organizations also provide a remedy against false or incomplete information. When knowledge is developed collaboratively, a much wider range of possibilities is considered, creating a better result than any individual would have provided on their own. Poor quality or incorrect information is weeded out through the collaborative process, ideally through compromise but as a last resort through voting. Though it does not grab headlines, this sort of collaborative work means that every aspect of our modern society functions as well as possible, from the quality of the steel in your razor to the complex protocols that deliver our streaming video.

Unfortunately, that streaming data also delivers deliberately false information. So far we have not developed a remedy for this, and this is one place where hard science fiction can help. Some of the technologies we use today were imagined in the science fiction through the middle of the twentieth century. It is now up to science fiction to imagine new forms of government and new legal structures that are suited to an advanced society. Imagining these "soft" innovations and developing them in literature will lead society to solutions to problems such as Internet trolls just as imagining geosynchronous telecommunication satellites led to technologies such as GPS.

In Without Gravity this appears in the concept of the Public Trust, where all adults are expected to behave in a responsible manner through the comm network and people with greater responsibility in society are held to a higher standard. Whether this exact system becomes a reality only time will tell, but for an advanced society to exist something similar will have to happen. We see today how the lack of a system like this is damaging our response to COVID-19, with doctors reporting that the unrestrained cruelty of internet trolls is second only to the loss of patients as an emotional burden caused by the crisis. Our society must evolve new ideas of the public square.

An evolved concept of the public square is also part of the discussion science fiction should be having. Our current laws are based on a long gone time, when the public square was literally the town square and people had to interact face to face. People say things using remote communication that they would never say in person, but our legal structure is still based in a time when people drove horse buggies to meet. The ability to broadcast cruel falsehoods to anonymous millions requires a different legal system than the one that worked when an audience of dozens could directly face a speaker. Science fiction can and should imagine different ways the public square will appear in the future. I don't believe it will be a dystopian, authoritarian, public square where narrow rules harshly punish infractions. We have evolved past tarring and feathering, at least in a physical sense, but what will the connected future look like?

There is no going back. COVID-19 will change the way we live our lives, and the story we write of the future does not need to be one of fear, it does not need to be a zombie apocalypse. We have examples of collaborative systems that work, and we can through science fiction imagine even better ways to live in a complex, advanced, technological society. Our current systems have failed us, but we can do better. We can live in a world where planning has provided enough testing materials and PPE, and our leadership effectively manages a crisis. Science fiction allows us to test the ideas that will make a better society.  We need to take the best of those ideas and make them real. We must imagine a better world, then make it happen.

Kris Butler